ReviewPRO is a platform of AI-powered tools that walks your manuscript from idea to publication — choosing the right journal, checking compliance, rehearsing peer review, and supporting editors when it lands on their desk.
Researchers spend months picking the wrong journal, formatting against vague guidelines, and waiting for reviewer comments they could have predicted themselves. We're rebuilding that journey, one tool at a time.
Authors waste 3–6 months on average submitting to journals that desk-reject for scope mismatch.
Every journal has different rules. Most rejections at the format check could have been avoided in an afternoon.
The weaknesses reviewers flag are almost always predictable. They just get caught too late.
Each tool solves one specific problem in scientific publishing. Use them on their own or as a connected workflow. Some are live, some shipping this summer, some on the roadmap — we'll be honest about which is which.
Here's where each tool fits into the path of a manuscript. You don't have to use all of them — but together they make the difference between guessing and knowing.
You have a paper, a story to tell, and a target audience in mind. What's missing is everything that happens next.
Match your manuscript against 9,000+ journals based on scope, topic, audience, and impact.
PubFitCheck formatting, length, structure, and policy compliance against your target journal — before you submit.
JournalFitGet a preliminary AI-assisted scientific review so you can fix weaknesses reviewers would flag.
ReviewFitYou hit submit knowing your paper fits the journal, meets every rule, and has already survived its first round of critique.
On the other side, editors use our tools to triage submissions, find qualified reviewers, and clear desks faster.
DeskFit · ReviewerFit · CongFitCongFit isn't one-size-fits-all. We build a dedicated abstract- and contribution-management platform for each scientific society — shaped around your review workflow, your scoring criteria, your competency areas, and your brand.
Multi-phase editorial pipeline, role-based access (authors, scientific committee, reviewers), and automatic discrepancy flagging — configured to how your society actually works.
Custom scoring rubrics and competency classification mapped to your field — so abstracts are evaluated against the standards your community cares about.
AI handles the formal, repetitive checks; your committee keeps every scientific decision. Faster congresses, without giving up rigor.
A short call to understand your congress, your volumes, and your review process.
We configure CongFit to your workflow, criteria, and brand — and pilot it on a real call.
Your committee manages the whole abstract flow from one platform, season after season.
Let's design a review process as rigorous as your science. Book a 30-minute call.
We've been authors, reviewers, and editors. We've felt every friction point in scientific publishing — and built ReviewPRO to remove them, one tool at a time.
After years of frustration as author, reviewer, and editor, I realized the publication system needed more than reform — it needed reinvention. ReviewPRO was born from a simple idea: build the tools we always wished existed.
A microcredential in the age of AI
Alongside our software, ReviewPRO contributes to training the next generation of authors, reviewers, and editors. This microcredential course covers scientific publishing and editorial ethics in the age of AI — delivered in collaboration with the University of Granada (UGR) under the Arqus European University Alliance.
We ship one new tool every few weeks this summer. Leave your email and we'll let you know when each one goes live — no marketing fluff.
We'll only email you about new tool launches. Unsubscribe anytime.